It will be interesting to see just what enforcements are carried out once the Hague Convention is signed, since there have been comments in the media about special enforcement of overseas court rulings. If such enforcement measures did happen, I can imagine that Japanese left behind parents themselves might go to foreign countries, hoping to start a court action and see if they can get the same special treatment that foreigners may start getting. And if that happens, THEN the Japanese media will pick up the story and any LBPJ-type organizations here will see a big pick up in interest and support.

One thing that sticks out about that autobiography is Fukuzawa’s description of drinking water out of a glass that was filled with ice and his amazement that such things exist in America.

I appreciate your comments and your work with WWJ also. A few points:

“++While we can all guess about numbers since, unlike with AT&T, SoftBank still refuses to reveal actual results. For the sake of discussion; “if” they have moved about three million units, that’s well under 3% of total active market share and it should be clearly noted that both Nokia and Mitsubishi actually ceased operations here at that level or even better. One has to wonder what the total market share “to-date” is for iPhone vs. say HTC or Blackberry?”

Why would a handset maker care about “total active market share” unless they are dependent on selling follow-on services/add-ons? Even Apple, which probably derives more revenue from after the sale than anyone else, doesn’t consider this to be a significant portion of their revenue.
A handset maker should be most interested in its current (and future) share of the market for similar goods, such as smartphones, and, if the article is to be believed, Apple is doing incredibly well at 72%. “Total active market share” doesn’t make any sense for a maker–most could care less if the purchaser threw the device away the very next day.

“++ Good points. As a fashion accessory, certainly, but how many people do you know with an iPhone as their ‘only’ handset?”

A minor point (and I don’t run in mobile industry circles), but almost all of the people I know carry only one handset, including those with an iPhone.

“++Why is it that when something like this comes from U.S. – powered by the 5th Ave. marketing machine – people call it ‘innovation’ even though the entire model is clearly based on the well-established Japanese approach.”

I think this is an incredibly important comment because you, like many other commentators in Japan (and more than a few stodgy old Japanese telecoms), have completely missed the true innovation of the iPhone. The iPhone was the first mobile handset where the focal point of the device was software, not hardware.

This hardware bias is most on display with your following comment: “[w]hile no doubt the iPhone UI is slick, the extra features – such as TV and Payments…” In one sentence, you’ve skimmed over the true importance of the iPhone, it’s software, with the “UI is slick” and proceeded straight to a hardware analysis.

Let’s hope that Japanese manufacturers don’t keep making the same mistakes. I still remember getting one of the first iMode phones way back in 1999 and being blown away by it. I sincerely hope to be as blown away by a Japanese device again in the future. If only they can figure out that we live in a software world.

You know I respect your work, but wanted to provide ACCJ members an additional layer of – hopefully thoughtful – insight to the comments made in this article. ++ See inline below++

—————————————-

For years, Japan has been known as the world’s leader in mobile technology. The country’s cell phone makers still churn out over 100 super-advanced units per year, with almost every handset offering a wide array of flashy functions. Japan’s 95 million mobile subscribers were the first to use their keitai (cell phone) to access the web, make payments, play games on the go, read e-books, and shoot videos with HD quality. The nation’s multi-billion dollar mobile hardware market has always been almost exclusively in the hands of domestic players. Supported by strong ties to local carriers, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung and other foreign giants were fended off successfully for about a decade.

++ Handset makers from overseas, also including HTC, have all had various degrees success in the Japan market. However, as the model here is based on direct B2B relationships between the operator and device maker, this represents a unique challenge to their standard one design fits all approach. It needs to be understood that all handsets in Japan must conform the the operator specs and that they are the actual client for the purchase order, taking the P&L risk position. This tight integration is a key reason why Japan has near 100% adoption of 3G and continues to be far (far) ahead of other markets in segments ranging from data usage with imode (et all) to mobile payments via FeliCa.

Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, and other makers had a good run until around 2008, when Japan’s third-largest cell phone carrier, SoftBank, brought Apple’s iPhone to Japan. The American “smartphone” not only took the once impenetrable Japanese mobile market by storm, it disrupted the industry as a whole. According to estimates, Apple has managed to sell well over three million iPhones in Japan so far, now boasting an impressive 72 percent of the domestic smartphone market.

++ While we can all guess about numbers since, unlike with AT&T, SoftBank still refuses to reveal actual results. For the sake of discussion; “if” they have moved about three million units, that’s well under 3% of total active market share and it should be clearly noted that both Nokia and Mitsubishi actually ceased operations here at that level or even better. One has to wonder what the total market share “to-date” is for iPhone vs. say HTC or Blackberry?

The iPhone is now the nation’s must-have personal companion, thanks to SoftBank’s marketing acumen, the quality of the device itself, and (most importantly) the year-long complacency shown by domestic carriers and phone manufacturers in a continuously expanding, high-margin market.

++ Good points. As a fashion accessory, certainly, but how many people do you know with an iPhone as their ‘only’ handset? Clearly SBM has put all of their marketing effort behind this, a fact noted by it’s total domination on the show floor during my recent visit to the Omote Sando shop. It’s interesting to me that no one has pointed out the Antenna ‘quality’ issues are something we have never seen on Japanese phones? At any rate, indeed it takes about 1-year from design to delivery and we will begin to see a wide range of PDA styled voice enabled units, like the new Kyocera ‘droid, made for global markets going forward.

But growth, which began in the late 1990s and continued through the mid 2000s, has come to an end. Hit by the recession and a rapidly graying user base, domestic shipments of handsets fell 12.3 percent year on year to a 12-year low of 31 million units in fiscal 2009. Exports have been historically weak. Worldwide, only London-based Sony Ericsson (a joint venture between Sony and Sweden’s biggest telecommunications firm), commands a noteworthy market share of 5.1 percent.

++ I would humbly suggest the dip in 2009 handset numbers had much more to do with the Ministry mandated change in subsidies than anything else. Otherwise, obviously the fully branded handsets produced by NEC, Sharp or Fujitsu have been rare to find overseas, attributed largely to the noted above B2B business model working in reverse against them. That being said, it should be noted that the component market, according to JEITA, shows a significant majority of handsets coming from all makers actually are powered by parts made by Japanese OEMs.

The mobile sector in Japan is often referred to as the “Galapagos Islands” for its unique, practically closed mobile phone infrastructure. The most prominent explanation for the Galapagos syndrome is i-mode, a mobile web service tailor-made for handsets, which NTT DoCoMo launched in 1998. Japan’s top telecommunications firm practically kick-started the mobile Internet as a whole, but failed to export it to the U.S. and other markets. SoftBank and KDDI, Japan’s second-largest telco, never even tried to take their proprietary web technologies abroad.

++ I’m not a big fan of the G-word, perhaps useful if trying to explain to non-industry cab-driver types but not very accurate. All major players in the global telecom space have long been very active here, think Ericsson, IBM and HP, you just don’t see them so much as a consumer facing brand. Perhaps one of the best examples would be KDDI who has been running their entire network on Qualcomm or e-mobile built their network with Huewai. As for taking the model overseas, well books have been done on that, however I will say that execution by the partners in most cases was clear cause for failure. Whether it was lack of handsets, insane revenue share to content providers, plus widly over-priced data billing, combined with tight lock on official content partners, you could ‘call’ it imode.. but it was clearly nothing like the original model.

Another example is 1Seg, an industry-wide mobile TV standard that’s supported by most of Japan’s cell phones but has so far been adopted by just a handful countries in South America. As a result, many Japanese phones had (and still have) a number of unique features that miss the mark in other countries.

++ I’m glad you brought this up as it’s a standard case in point I like to use when trying to explain the Japan mobile market to international clients. If we look at the adoption of cameraphones – originally commercialized in Japan – for a baseline, the value proposition and path to deploy from any operator or handset maker perspective it was a low barrier for adoption. However, getting everything in order to run terrestrial digital tv is another matter all together. Yet, Japan has managed to bring the home tv market to your phone, using the same ad-supported business model, without a noticeable handset cost and – importantly – no monthly channel subscription fee. I would kindly suggest that, like the cameraphone, which back then was attributed to something like “those Japanese – just love taking photos”, this offering will come to global markets once they can get all relevant parties at the table to agree on whatever technology platform. Certainly, it’s a far better approach than trying to stream content over already increasingly bloated 3G networks everywhere.

And it’s not just the hardware. The success of the iPhone has shown the Japanese mobile industry that it has to quickly catch up in terms of software and usability, too. iPhone users can download about 200,000 apps, or small software programs (games, productivity tools, e-books, etc.), many of which are Apple-exclusive. As a gaming device, the iPhone has become so popular that video game behemoth Nintendo recently said it now regards Apple as its main future rival.

++ Indeed.. I always say that that Apple did a super job to copy the DoCoMo imode platform model, controlling the handset and content platform with billing. Other than a 70/30 rev. share, instead of 90/10 here, it’s a mirror image of the so-accused walled garden. Now, if only it had Flash and removable memory card..

The American company also has an edge in terms of user-friendliness, an area in which Japan’s handset makers haven’t been innovating for years. Whereas the iPhone is designed to be extra-easy to use and comes with just a handful of functions out of the box, most of today’s Japanese cell phones feature a plethora of gratuitous features and clunky user interfaces that have remained practically unchanged in over a decade.

++ Hmmm.. while no doubt the iPhone UI is slick, the extra features – such as TV and Payments – along with full Flash capabilities are clearly valuable and targeted too the domestic market..?!?

Beaten at their own game, Japan’s once proud, but now dethroned cell phone makers are ready to strike back with new software, massive consolidation and aggressive internationalization. Japan’s carriers are slowly starting to embrace Android, an operating system for cell phones which was developed by Google and has two distinct advantages: It is open source (license-free) software, and it’s already being used in millions of handsets worldwide.

++ I’m not sure how the ‘maybe’ 3% market share in Japan equates to “beaten at their own game”.. it should not be so difficult to imagine that the consolidated strength of Japan handset makers could – and indeed will – make significant strides into world markets once they focus their priorities on that adventure!

DoCoMo recently announced that it intends to develop (and export) its own mobile operating system. The goal of the software, which is backed by four of Japan’s top handset makers, is to reduce development costs and boost international competitiveness. Last year, NEC, Casio and Hitachi decided to merge their cell phone operations to become the nation’s second-biggest manufacturer (following Sharp). The new company, dubbed NEC Casio Mobile, has already set its sights outside Japan. Four of the twelve million cell phones it plans to ship in 2012 are expected to go to the U.S. and other foreign markets. Overall, it now seems clear the iPhone sounded a loud wake-up call for Japan’s mobile players to finally leave the coziness of their Galapagos ecosystem.

++ There’s that G-Word again, a definite pattern developing here.. Lets face it, there is a clear dis-connect between marketing and merit, on both sides. I’d be willing to wager that Sharp has sold as many handsets in Japan alone over the last couple of years than than Apple can claim for iphone in the entire APAC region! Yet, we do not hear much about the silent steady and humble approach of domestic players in the international media. Perhaps, like Toyota with their Lexus brand, someday we will.

I will close with this thought: Why is it that when something like this comes from U.S. – powered by the 5th Ave. marketing machine – people call it ‘innovation’ even though the entire model is clearly based on the well-established Japanese approach.. which sadly somehow falls under a far less endearing term, quarantine comes to mind, like Galapagos?

Kindest regards,

Lars

This post was mentioned on Twitter by djtokyo: RT @serkantoto: My piece on Japan’s VC industry in the Journal of the American Chamber of Commerce in Japan: http://bit.ly/cofD8G...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TweetMeetJapan: More on the #Japan Visa Renewal vs proof of National Health Insurance: ACCJ Journal | In Good Health http://ow.ly/VVHc via @GoodPeopleJapan…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by serkantoto: My 1st article is “Japan’s Robot Boom”. Read it in the print version of the ACCJ Journal or here: http://bit.ly/7aRI75...

I assume this newly constructed “trap” is designed to catch the large numbers of Japanese citizen who are not in the health system, but it will also hit foreign citizen buyers of real estate and homes. Has anyone in banking, real estate or related fields run into this issue? Work-arounds?

This is bad situation for most Japanese, but an excellent opportunity for foreign firms. Wherever there is polarization, there is a grudging but eventual capitulation of the losers to try new technologies, new financings, and new partnerships. Furthermore, those companies heading overseas are now needing to tap into the bilingual and multinational employment, knowledge, and legal markets — all areas where foreign firms excel and where they can make major contributions.

Terrie Lloyd
LINC Media Inc.

The Naked Leader is a leadership cookbook, making it ideal for new managers and for those who have been knocked around a bit and need some review work. First half of the book is about what you need to do in order to set goals and achieve them for yourself, and the second half is how to do the same thing for your team members.

Available from Amazon.com.

Terrie